After US election, it is China’s
Party
S P SETH
By a strange coincidence, the United States and
China have been going through a leadership transition at about the same time.
And what a contrast! In the US where Barack Obama has been returned as
President for another term of four years, the election was a high political
drama played out in the public space with both rival candidates making their
own pitch for popular mandate. It was a chaotic and boisterous affair with a
long drawn-out pre-election battle, with neither candidate knowing for sure
their political destiny until the end.
In China, the meeting of the 18th Party Congress
to formally anoint a new leadership for the next 10 years was very carefully
choreographed and controlled without popular participation and lacking any sense
of political drama. It has been known for quite sometime that Xi Jinping,
vice-president, will succeed Hu Jintao as the CPC’s general secretary and the
country’s new president early next year, and Li Keqiang, a vice-premier, will
replace Wen Jiabao as premier. And this has come to eventuate, as well as a
7-member standing committee (the country’s apex governing body), a new
politburo and central committee. This is China’s top political structure for
the next ten years.
China’s economy is now the world’s second largest
though, in the last few years, its growth rate has slowed. The country’s
frantic economic growth in the last thirty years, with many millions lifted out
of poverty and a rising middle class, has created some severe structural and
societal problems. Hu Jintao, the outgoing party general secretary, highlighted
some of them in his work report to the Congress, with special emphasis on corruption
in the higher echelons of the party.
He warned that, “If we fail to handle this issue well,
it could prove fatal to the party, and even cause collapse of the party and the
fall of the state.” And added, “All those who violate party discipline and
state laws, whoever they are or whatever power or official positions they have,
must be brought to justice without mercy.” Apart from being a general statement
of intent, this seemed like a pointed reference to the case of the dismissed
Chongqing party boss, Bo Xilai, who will soon be tried for corruption and other
charges.
The pertinent question, though, is: why didn’t the
outgoing party leadership deal with this issue during the last ten years they
were in power, when Premier Wen Jiabao was singling it out as a major issue for
some years now? During all this
time corruption has grown like a virus infecting the entire body politic of the
country, suggesting a serious disconnect between rhetoric and action. Which
would suggest that corruption is now deeply entrenched into the system at all levels,
preventing any serious action to clean up the system.
Indeed, a recent investigative report in the New
York Times has found that Premier Wen Jiabao’s family (without pointing a
finger at the premier himself) has amassed nearly $2.7 billion worth of fortune
through all kinds of direct or indirect business deals. Which, of course, has
been vigorously denied, and termed as an attempt to destabilize the country.
However, the Chinese authorities have blocked any access on the internet to the
New York Times’ report. Similarly, it is reported that the new party general
secretary, Xi Jinping’s family too have helped themselves to a billion dollar
fortune.
Whether or not these reports are true or
tendentious, the question of corruption in the party, as highlighted by Hu
Jintao in his report, is a make or break issue not only for the party but also
for the Chinese state. Xi Jinping, the CPC’s new general secretary (and the country’s
new president from early next year) has also highlighted the danger from
corruption for the party as well as the state. But he too hasn’t unveiled any
new strategy to root out this monster.
Apparently, it is a very sensitive issue and any
radical action might not suit all the stakeholders. But without an effective
strategy, backed up with necessary institutional changes like greater political
transparency and accountability, this is likely to aggravate social unrest in
China. With economic growth slowing, even as the wealth gap widens between rich
and poor and between urban and rural areas, the government cannot afford to let
this issue become a trigger for spontaneous social combustion like the Arab
Spring in the Middle East.
In whatever way the CCP tackles social, economic and
political issues; China today is undoubtedly a powerful country. And this is
due to the economic reforms, since the eighties, under Deng Xiaoping. What
should be the next course of action to propel the country’s economy is a
divisive issue in the party. The Bo Xilai affair was a manifestation of it, as
he unfurled Mao’s red banner against economic liberalization. Wen Jiabao, the
outgoing Premier, on the other hand, has been a strong proponent of further economic
liberalization, as well as some political reforms. In his report to the
Congress, Hu Jiantao too emphasized the need for economic and political reforms,
but again without any clear direction.
However, there is one issue that broadly unites the
country and that is to build up a strong military to assert China’s national
power. And Hu Jintao stressed the need for China to build a “strong national
defense and powerful armed forces.” Apparently keeping in view China’s maritime
disputes with some of its neighbors, he didn’t mince his words when he said,
“We should enhance our capacity for exploiting marine resources, resolutely
safeguard China’s maritime rights and interests and build China into a maritime
power.”
It is interesting that even though China’s finances
are in a much better shape than the United States with foreign currency
reserves of over 3 trillion dollars, it appears to be losing economic momentum,
not knowing how to break the logjam between its competing political factions in
the party. In an altogether different political landscape from China, and
despite Barack Obama’s re-election as the country’s President, the United
States is also stuck in a rot of sorts. Against this backdrop, when there are no
easy solutions to internal problems, there is always a danger of hyper
nationalism getting out of control, especially in the volatile Asia-Pacific
region. And this is a challenge for both China and the United States.
Note: This article was first published in the Daily Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment